CRITERIA 2.2.4 a

 

2

2.2.4 Quality of Students Projects and Report Writing                                    35

 (A) Identification of projects and allocation methodology                                                    03


2.2.4.A.1 Project allocation process

·         Before commencement of 5th semester, all the faculty members are requested to submit the list of projects which they intend to offer the final year students.

·         The compiled list is displayed on the notice board.

·         Students can select project title from this list based on their interest.

·         University Syllabus also provide project titles and students can select their project from that list based on their interest.

·         At the beginning of the semester, students are addressed by their project mentors and procedure for project selection and various aspects of Project implemented by GTU are explained.

·         Generally, two or three project mentors are allocated per batch.

·         Students are also motivated to go through various problem statements given by different sectors of society for hackathon event conducted by government of Gujarat and visit the industry during semester break to find the industrial problems for their academic project.

·         Students are also encouraged to work on their own unique ideas.

·         Project proposal is presented to all project mentors with their idea and mapping with POs & PSOs. If Project is not properly justified with POs and PSOs, then that project topic is rejected.

·         After careful examination of the idea presented by the teams of students, final allocation of project done by project mentors in consultation with HOD.

Implementation details for Projects:

·     Generally academic term of each semester has 14 weeks and university provides suggestive work distribution of project for entire semester which may vary from project to project which is shown below.

·         Students are briefed about the objectives, outcomes and specific outcomes of the projects and steps to be followed by their project mentors.

·         Identification of Project: Either student came with their own project title from their area of interest or they select project title from project list prepared by project mentors or from the university syllabus.

·         Projects are allocated on first come first serve bases when required.

·         While finalizing the project topic, Projects having innovation component are advised to apply for SSIP grant for making prototype.

·         Internal evaluation is carried out by respective project mentors during the semester as per the instructions given by university.

·         Students have to prepare report of their project as per the guidelines provided by university.

·         Final university evaluation by external faculty at the end of semester. 


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

CRITERIA 2.2.3 B

Image
  Ø The Instrumentation & Conrol engineering department has well equipped laboratory Ø For benefits of students and better learning experience, Students are encouraged to explore Virtual Labs which have been made available by MHRD. Ø Micro project has been assigned to students in a group of 2 to 3 students for enhancing their learning skills. Ø In addition to this Model/Chart preparation has been assigned to students in a group of 2 to 3 students.  Experiments performed using virtual lab Micro Projects Models
Read more

CRITERIA 2.2.6 A

Image
  2.2.6     Information Access Facilities and Student Centric Learning Initiatives         15 A. Availability of facilities & Effective Utilization                                                                                    10   Central library Ø     Institute has central digital library available which has books of total volume of 16608 with 5327               titles are available for students. Ø     Out of total books 830 books are of Instrumentation and Control engineering. Ø     Besides the books magazines and newspapers are also available in the library. Ø     List of available magazine/news...
Read more

3.3

Image
      ·    PO and PSO attainment is evaluated based on the performance of direct assessment and indirect assessment processes. To measure attainment of POs and PSOs, direct and indirect assessments have 80% and 20% weightage respectively   (a) Direct Attainment In direct Attainment there are two assessment required . 1)Internal assessment 2) External assessment · In this Process first all course subject course outcomes mapping with Program outcome (PO1 to PO7) with  level 1,2,3 ·   CO attainment for all courses through internal and external assessment ·   For Example to evaluate the PO attainment all COs which correlate with PO1, multiply with CO attainment individually. ·   So sum of that value divided by sum of correlation level with PO1 is attainment of One course with PO1. For Example: CO Correlation Level with PO1 CO- Attainment Col 2 × Col 3 Attainment of course with PO1...
Read more