1.4

 

         The following process was adopted in developing department vision and mission statements:

·         Detailed analysis was conducted by considering internal stakeholders including Faculties, Students, Alumni

·         The information related to Vision, Mission, PEOs were collected, summarized and the faculty listed the most critical areas to be addressed by the department.

·         Based on the feedback given by the stakeholders the departmental faculty developed a strong and meaningful vision and mission.

·         The mission was also finalized based on the following components like Quality education, Professional career, higher education, Innovation and Creativity and Lifelong learning.

ROLE OF STAKE HOLDERS:

·         Student: By taking student feedback for program we reformed the vision mission.

·         Faculties: The role of faculties is more important to find vision, mission .for that we have arranged many meetings for vision mission to relate institute vision mission. We made 2 to 3 groups for faculties and took suggestions from them.

·         Alumni: The feedback of the passed out students for whole instrumentation & control program has been taken, so by correcting them we take view from alumni students

·         Employer: we have arranged meeting for vision, mission at 17-7-19, that time well experienced employee came and valuable suggestion has been given

·         Parents: Parents of the students came for reform the vision mission of the department

 

The above steps are presented in the following flowchart shown in figure




FIGURE 1.1 PROCESS FOR DEFINING THE VISION AND MISSION OF DEPARTMENT

 

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

CRITERIA 2.2.3 B

Image
  Ø The Instrumentation & Conrol engineering department has well equipped laboratory Ø For benefits of students and better learning experience, Students are encouraged to explore Virtual Labs which have been made available by MHRD. Ø Micro project has been assigned to students in a group of 2 to 3 students for enhancing their learning skills. Ø In addition to this Model/Chart preparation has been assigned to students in a group of 2 to 3 students.  Experiments performed using virtual lab Micro Projects Models
Read more

CRITERIA 2.2.6 A

Image
  2.2.6     Information Access Facilities and Student Centric Learning Initiatives         15 A. Availability of facilities & Effective Utilization                                                                                    10   Central library Ø     Institute has central digital library available which has books of total volume of 16608 with 5327               titles are available for students. Ø     Out of total books 830 books are of Instrumentation and Control engineering. Ø     Besides the books magazines and newspapers are also available in the library. Ø     List of available magazine/news...
Read more

3.3

Image
      ·    PO and PSO attainment is evaluated based on the performance of direct assessment and indirect assessment processes. To measure attainment of POs and PSOs, direct and indirect assessments have 80% and 20% weightage respectively   (a) Direct Attainment In direct Attainment there are two assessment required . 1)Internal assessment 2) External assessment · In this Process first all course subject course outcomes mapping with Program outcome (PO1 to PO7) with  level 1,2,3 ·   CO attainment for all courses through internal and external assessment ·   For Example to evaluate the PO attainment all COs which correlate with PO1, multiply with CO attainment individually. ·   So sum of that value divided by sum of correlation level with PO1 is attainment of One course with PO1. For Example: CO Correlation Level with PO1 CO- Attainment Col 2 × Col 3 Attainment of course with PO1...
Read more